Spicer v. Byrd
130 S.E.2d 328, 259 N.C. 245, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 531
This text of 130 S.E.2d 328 (Spicer v. Byrd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Spicer v. Byrd, 130 S.E.2d 328, 259 N.C. 245, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 531 (N.C. 1963).
Opinion
There was plenary evidence in the trial below to support the verdict. Furthermore, a careful review of the evidence and the charge of the court leaves us with the impression that the defendants’ exceptions and assignments of error present insufficient prejudicial error to justify the granting of a new trial.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
130 S.E.2d 328, 259 N.C. 245, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spicer-v-byrd-nc-1963.