Spicer Land Company v. Louis Hirman
This text of 244 N.W. 553 (Spicer Land Company v. Louis Hirman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was an action for conversion of cattle and hogs which defendant shipped to market for and the proceeds of which were paid to plaintiffs farm tenant. The trial court found for defendant, and the plaintiff appeals from an order denying its motion for a new trial.
We have carefully examined the record, including exhibits, and discover no evidence of ownership by plaintiff of the stock alleged to have been converted or of the identity of the stock shipped with that missing from the farm.
It follows that the order of the district court must be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
244 N.W. 553, 187 Minn. 142, 1932 Minn. LEXIS 978, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spicer-land-company-v-louis-hirman-minn-1932.