Spicer ex rel. Spicer v. Aquatic Activities, Inc.

139 So. 2d 462, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3490
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 16, 1962
DocketNo. 2703
StatusPublished

This text of 139 So. 2d 462 (Spicer ex rel. Spicer v. Aquatic Activities, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spicer ex rel. Spicer v. Aquatic Activities, Inc., 139 So. 2d 462, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3490 (Fla. Ct. App. 1962).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Raphael v. Koretzky, Fla.App.1958, 102 So.2d ,746; Kislak v. Kreedian, Fla.1957, 95 So.2d 510; Messana v. Maule Industries, Inc., Fla.1951, 50 So.2d 874.

SHANNON, C. J., and ALLEN and WHITE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Messana v. Maule Industries
50 So. 2d 874 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1951)
Kislak v. Kreedian
95 So. 2d 510 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
139 So. 2d 462, 1962 Fla. App. LEXIS 3490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spicer-ex-rel-spicer-v-aquatic-activities-inc-fladistctapp-1962.