Spice v. Pierce Cnty.

Washington Supreme Court

Spice v. Pierce Cnty.

441 P.3d 1191, 193 Wash. 2d 1014

Washington Supreme Court·Decided June 5, 2019·No. No. 96837-3·Published

Opinion

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its June 4, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 The Petitioners' motion for extension of time to file petition for review is granted. The petition for review is denied.

For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

¶ 1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its June 4, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 The Petitioners' motion for extension of time to file petition for review is granted. The petition for review is denied.

For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

Spice v. Pierce Cnty., 441 P.3d 1191, 193 Wash. 2d 1014 (Wash. 2019).

Pincite

441 P.3d 1191 (Spice v. Pierce Cnty.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.