Spiccia v. Paterson Silk Throwing Co., Inc.
28 A.2d 120, 129 N.J.L. 100, 1942 N.J. LEXIS 292
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Spiccia v. Paterson Silk Throwing Co., Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 127 N.J.L. 509 →
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons' expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance—The Chancellor, Parker, Bodine, Donges, Perskie, Porter, Colie, Dear, Wells, Rafferty, Hague, Thompson, JJ. 12.
For reversal —None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Spiccia v. Paterson Silk Throwing Co., Inc., 28 A.2d 120, 129 N.J.L. 100, 1942 N.J. LEXIS 292 (N.J. 1942).
28 A.2d 120 (Spiccia v. Paterson Silk Throwing Co., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.