Spialter v. Testa
This text of 408 A.2d 444 (Spialter v. Testa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MILLARD SPIALTER T/A LINDSLEY ARMS APARTMENTS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
PETER TESTA, LOUISE TESTA, AND ANTHONY TESTA, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Before Judges BISCHOFF and DWYER.
Mr. Philip I. Levitan, argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Menza and Levitan, attorneys).
Respondents did not file a brief.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the Morris County District Court here under review is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge MacKenzie in his written opinion reported in Spialter v. Testa, 162 N.J. Super. 421 (D.Ct. 1978).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
408 A.2d 444, 171 N.J. Super. 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spialter-v-testa-njsuperctappdiv-1979.