Spevack v. Strauss

355 U.S. 601, 78 S. Ct. 536, 2 L. Ed. 2d 525, 116 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 348, 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1425
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 3, 1958
Docket641
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 355 U.S. 601 (Spevack v. Strauss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spevack v. Strauss, 355 U.S. 601, 78 S. Ct. 536, 2 L. Ed. 2d 525, 116 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 348, 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1425 (1958).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the Court of Appeals, and the orders of the Court of Appeals denying petitioner’s motion for leave to amend the complaint and petition for rehearing, are vacated. The case is remanded to the Court of Appeals with instructions (1) to allow petitioner’s proposed amendments to the complaint and (2) to determine, in light of the amended complaint, the issues raised by petitioner’s appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Davidson v. Dixon
386 F. Supp. 482 (D. Delaware, 1974)
PSALIDAS
11 I. & N. Dec. 76 (Board of Immigration Appeals, 1965)
Jerome S. Spevack v. Lewis L. Strauss
257 F.2d 208 (D.C. Circuit, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
355 U.S. 601, 78 S. Ct. 536, 2 L. Ed. 2d 525, 116 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 348, 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spevack-v-strauss-scotus-1958.