Sperry v. Hellman
16 N.Y.S. 954, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2338
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sperry v. Hellman. Read the opinion of the Court — 13 N.Y.S. 899 →
Opinion
The motion papers do not disclose any of the grounds specified in rule 16 of the general term rules upon which a reargument may be allowed, and this motion is for that reason denied. The question involved in this appeal is, however, of sufficient importance to merit the attention of the court of appeals, and respondent may, if he desires it, have leave to appeal tothát court. No costs of this motion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sperry v. Hellman, 16 N.Y.S. 954, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2338 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).
16 N.Y.S. 954 (Sperry v. Hellman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.