Sperry v. Brown

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sperry v. Brown

49 A.D.2d 864, 375 N.Y.S.2d 564, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11049

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 28, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 49 A.D.2d 864 (Sperry v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sperry v. Brown, 49 A.D.2d 864, 375 N.Y.S.2d 564, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11049 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered July 7, 1975, which granted the motion of plaintiff, a stockholder of Avon Products, Inc., for renewal, reargument and rehearing, and directed defendants to submit to examination before trial, unanimously affirmed. Respondent shall recover of appellants $40 costs and disbursements of this appeal. The substantial sales of stock by certain of the corporate officers, the time of such sales and the corporate margin of profit during the third quarter of 1973, constitute sufficient special circumstances to provide a basis for inquiry, and to warrant the examinations allowed. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Markewich, Tilzer, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered July 7, 1975, which granted the motion of plaintiff, a stockholder of Avon Products, Inc., for renewal, reargument and rehearing, and directed defendants to submit to examination before trial, unanimously affirmed. Respondent shall recover of appellants $40 costs and disbursements of this appeal. The substantial sales of stock by certain of the corporate officers, the time of such sales and the corporate margin of profit during the third quarter of 1973, constitute sufficient special circumstances to provide a basis for inquiry, and to warrant the examinations allowed. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Markewich, Tilzer, Capozzoli and Lane, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.D.2d 864, 375 N.Y.S.2d 564, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11049, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sperry-v-brown-nyappdiv-1975.