Spero v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Spero v. State

156 So. 25, 115 Fla. 771, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1681

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Spero v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 111 Fla. 794 →

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 10, 1934·Published

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff in error was indicted charged with the offense of murder in the first degree. He was convicted of murder in the second degree. The evidence as' disclosed by the record was ample to have sustained a verdict and judgment of murder in the first degree.

We find no reversible error disclosed by the record. The judgment should be affirmed. It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield and Buford, J. J., concur. Davis, C. J., and Terrell, J., concur in the conclusion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff in error was indicted charged with the offense of murder in the first degree. He was convicted of murder in the second degree. The evidence as' disclosed by the record was ample to have sustained a verdict and judgment of murder in the first degree.

We find no reversible error disclosed by the record. The judgment should be affirmed. It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Whitfield and Buford, J. J., concur. Davis, C. J., and Terrell, J., concur in the conclusion.

Spero v. State, 156 So. 25, 115 Fla. 771, 1934 Fla. LEXIS 1681 (Fla. 1934).

Pincite

156 So. 25 (Spero v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related