Sperman v. Codd

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sperman v. Codd

62 A.D.2d 1062, 404 N.Y.S.2d 137, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11150

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 24, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 62 A.D.2d 1062 (Sperman v. Codd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sperman v. Codd, 62 A.D.2d 1062, 404 N.Y.S.2d 137, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11150 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review two determinations of the respondent Commissioner of the Police Department of the City of New York, the first of which denied petitioner Ida Sperman’s application for a "premises” pistol license and the second of which denied petitioner Jacob Sperman’s application to renew his "carry” pistol license, petitioners appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 31, 1977, which, inter alia, granted the respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition. Order and judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The proceeding not having been commenced within four months after the determinations to be reviewed became final and binding, it was barred by the Statute of Limitations (see CPLR 217). We note that the petitioners’ demand for the resolution of the grave problems so ably presented in the pro se brief, petition and supporting affidavits should be addressed to the Legislature. Titone; J. P., Suozzi, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review two determinations of the respondent Commissioner of the Police Department of the City of New York, the first of which denied petitioner Ida Sperman’s application for a "premises” pistol license and the second of which denied petitioner Jacob Sperman’s application to renew his "carry” pistol license, petitioners appeal from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated August 31, 1977, which, inter alia, granted the respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition. Order and judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. The proceeding not having been commenced within four months after the determinations to be reviewed became final and binding, it was barred by the Statute of Limitations (see CPLR 217). We note that the petitioners’ demand for the resolution of the grave problems so ably presented in the pro se brief, petition and supporting affidavits should be addressed to the Legislature. Titone; J. P., Suozzi, Margett and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 A.D.2d 1062, 404 N.Y.S.2d 137, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sperman-v-codd-nyappdiv-1978.