Sperling v. Rosen

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sperling v. Rosen

30 A.D.2d 823, 293 N.Y.S.2d 511, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3469

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 8, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 30 A.D.2d 823 (Sperling v. Rosen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sperling v. Rosen, 30 A.D.2d 823, 293 N.Y.S.2d 511, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3469 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated June 29, 1967, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. On the appeal from the order of said court dated November 10, 1967, on consent of respondent-appellant said order is modified, on the law and the facts, so as to direct that he pay petitioner’s attorney $300 for legal services rendered in prosecuting the appeal and defending the cross appeal from the order of June 29, 1967. As so modified, order of November 10, 1967 affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, $300 is a fair and reasonable amount for the legal services rendered to petitioner on the appeals from the order of June 29, 1967. Christ, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Benjamin, Munder and Martuseello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated June 29, 1967, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. On the appeal from the order of said court dated November 10, 1967, on consent of respondent-appellant said order is modified, on the law and the facts, so as to direct that he pay petitioner’s attorney $300 for legal services rendered in prosecuting the appeal and defending the cross appeal from the order of June 29, 1967. As so modified, order of November 10, 1967 affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, $300 is a fair and reasonable amount for the legal services rendered to petitioner on the appeals from the order of June 29, 1967. Christ, Acting P. J., Hopkins, Benjamin, Munder and Martuseello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 A.D.2d 823, 293 N.Y.S.2d 511, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sperling-v-rosen-nyappdiv-1968.