Sperling v. Newtown Laundry Service, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sperling v. Newtown Laundry Service, Inc.

264 A.D. 878, 35 N.Y.S.2d 588, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5218

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1942

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 264 A.D. 878 (Sperling v. Newtown Laundry Service, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sperling v. Newtown Laundry Service, Inc., 264 A.D. 878, 35 N.Y.S.2d 588, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5218 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order denying a motion to stay arbitration proceedings under subdivision 2 of section 1458 of the Civil Practice Act. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Petitioner was a member of the union of laundry workers and in the employ of the laundry operator at the time the latter made the contract with the union. Petitioner knew of the contract and that it was made by the union in his behalf as ,one of the members of the union. He also knew his wages, hours and other interests ;wcre served by the provisions of the contract. He became bound thereby. It contained the arbitration clause he now seeks to avoid. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, ■'Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order denying a motion to stay arbitration proceedings under subdivision 2 of section 1458 of the Civil Practice Act. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Petitioner was a member of the union of laundry workers and in the employ of the laundry operator at the time the latter made the contract with the union. Petitioner knew of the contract and that it was made by the union in his behalf as ,one of the members of the union. He also knew his wages, hours and other interests ;wcre served by the provisions of the contract. He became bound thereby. It contained the arbitration clause he now seeks to avoid. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, ■'Johnston, Adel and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 A.D. 878, 35 N.Y.S.2d 588, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sperling-v-newtown-laundry-service-inc-nyappdiv-1942.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack