Spergel v. Spergel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Spergel v. Spergel

33 A.D.2d 1027, 308 N.Y.S.2d 306, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5628

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 2, 1970

StatusPublished

This text of 33 A.D.2d 1027 (Spergel v. Spergel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spergel v. Spergel, 33 A.D.2d 1027, 308 N.Y.S.2d 306, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5628 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action in which plaintiff has been granted a judgment of divorce by the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 31, 1969, she appeals from so much of the judgment as (1) directed defendant to pay for support of plaintiff and the parties’ infant son, in stated amounts, and (2) denied plaintiff’s application for reimbursement of counsel fees paid by her. Judgment modified, on the law and the facts, by increasing the amount to be paid for support and maintenance of plaintiff and the infant son of the parties from $55 per week to $75 per week, to be apportioned $40 per week for plaintiff and $35 per week for the infant son. As so modified, judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to appellant. In our opinion, the award for support and maintenance was, on this record, inadequate to the extent indicated. Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur; Beldoek, P. J., and Christ, J., dissent and vote to affirm the judgment insofar as appealed from.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action in which plaintiff has been granted a judgment of divorce by the Supreme Court, Queens County, dated March 31, 1969, she appeals from so much of the judgment as (1) directed defendant to pay for support of plaintiff and the parties’ infant son, in stated amounts, and (2) denied plaintiff’s application for reimbursement of counsel fees paid by her. Judgment modified, on the law and the facts, by increasing the amount to be paid for support and maintenance of plaintiff and the infant son of the parties from $55 per week to $75 per week, to be apportioned $40 per week for plaintiff and $35 per week for the infant son. As so modified, judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs to appellant. In our opinion, the award for support and maintenance was, on this record, inadequate to the extent indicated. Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur; Beldoek, P. J., and Christ, J., dissent and vote to affirm the judgment insofar as appealed from.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 A.D.2d 1027, 308 N.Y.S.2d 306, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spergel-v-spergel-nyappdiv-1970.