Sperber v. Sperber

609 So. 2d 784, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13741, 1992 WL 385615
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sperber v. Sperber. Read the opinion of the Court — 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 11652
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 30, 1992·No. No. 92-2621·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant challenges a contempt order that was entered subsequent to an order denying appellant’s motion for disqualification of the trial judge. In a separate proceeding, appellant petitioned this court for a writ of prohibition directing the disqualification of the trial judge, which was granted. Sperber v. Sperber, 608 So.2d 145 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992). Because the contempt order was entered subsequent to the erroneous denial of appellant’s motion for disqualification, the contempt order is void. Neu v. Andrews, 528 So.2d 1278 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). Accordingly, we reverse the order appealed and remand for further proceedings.

REVERSED.

HERSEY, GUNTHER and POLEN, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sperber v. Sperber, 609 So. 2d 784, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13741, 1992 WL 385615 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

609 So. 2d 784 (Sperber v. Sperber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Neu v. Andrews
528 So. 2d 1278 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Sperber v. Sperber
608 So. 2d 145 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)