Spencer v. Wright
This text of 172 S.E. 91 (Spencer v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Ordinary hearsay testimony is wholly without probative value; and when introduced in evidence without objection, such testimony alone can not establish a fact. Eastlick v. So. Ry. Co., 116 Ga. 48.
2. Where certain hearsay testimony was introduced in evidence without objection, and the remaining evidence merely showed that at the time the piano claimed was levied on it was in the house or home occupied by the defendant in fi. fa. and the claimant, and the house was owned by the latter, the trial judge did not commit reversible error in directing a verdict for the claimant. Dean v. American Harrow Co., 112 Ga. 155; So. Mining Co. v. Brown, 107 Ga. 264, 266; Knowles v. Jordan, 61 Ga. 300; Willis v. Parker, 108 Ga. 778.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
172 S.E. 91, 48 Ga. App. 126, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spencer-v-wright-gactapp-1933.