Spencer v. Wright

172 S.E. 91, 48 Ga. App. 126, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 490
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided December 18, 1933·No. 23053·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

MacIntyre, J.

1. Ordinary hearsay testimony is wholly without probative value; and when introduced in evidence without objection, such testimony alone can not establish a fact. Eastlick v. So. Ry. Co., 116 Ga. 48.

2. Where certain hearsay testimony was introduced in evidence without objection, and the remaining evidence merely showed that at the time the piano claimed was levied on it was in the house or home occupied by the defendant in fi. fa. and the claimant, and the house was owned by the latter, the trial judge did not commit reversible error in directing a verdict for the claimant. Dean v. American Harrow Co., 112 Ga. 155; So. Mining Co. v. Brown, 107 Ga. 264, 266; Knowles v. Jordan, 61 Ga. 300; Willis v. Parker, 108 Ga. 778.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Guerry, J., concur. M. B. Eubanks, for plaintiff in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spencer v. Wright, 172 S.E. 91, 48 Ga. App. 126, 1933 Ga. App. LEXIS 490 (Ga. Ct. App. 1933).

172 S.E. 91 (Spencer v. Wright) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Leachman v. Mitchell
171 S.E.2d 760 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
Wade v. Hopper
78 S.E.2d 809 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)
Acme Fast Freight Inc. v. Southern Railway Co.
21 S.E.2d 493 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1942)
Brooks v. State
19 S.E.2d 43 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1942)
Earle v. Barrett
180 S.E. 855 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)