Spencer v. Webb
This text of 1 Cai. Cas. 118 (Spencer v. Webb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It appears that the defendant did not enter any appearance before the expiration of the rule, nor indeed was it until some weeks after that any appearance was entered. It is suggested in answer, that notice ought to have been served of the entry of the rule; this is, on the other hand, denied; and rightly. The default, therefore, is regular, and no reason whatever is assigned how it has been incurred. In all such cases we have determined to hold the party to his default, The rule
Motion granted, as to setting aside judgment only.
Radcliff and Livingston, Justices, absent.
а) Rule of October, 1791, Cole. Cas. 31.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Cai. Cas. 118, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spencer-v-webb-nysupct-1803.