Spencer v. Usher

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Spencer v. Usher

2 Day 116

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedJuly 1, 1805

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 2 Day 116 (Spencer v. Usher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spencer v. Usher, 2 Day 116 (Colo. 1805).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court unanimously affirmed the judgment.

Ells-worth, Asst,

expressed a clear opinion, that the principles, oh which auditors proceed, may be inquired into, to the extent of the rule in Parker v. Avery, which settled the point with precision, and ought to be regarded as a governing [121]*121ease. lie observed, that trials before auditors were partial-larly distinguished in this respect, that there is no court to regulate the admission of evidence, or to instruct the auditors in a point of law ; and that, of consequence, their award could not be assimilated to the verdict of a jury.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court unanimously affirmed the judgment.

Ells-worth, Asst,

expressed a clear opinion, that the principles, oh which auditors proceed, may be inquired into, to the extent of the rule in Parker v. Avery, which settled the point with precision, and ought to be regarded as a governing [121]*121ease. lie observed, that trials before auditors were partial-larly distinguished in this respect, that there is no court to regulate the admission of evidence, or to instruct the auditors in a point of law ; and that, of consequence, their award could not be assimilated to the verdict of a jury.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Day 116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spencer-v-usher-conn-1805.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack