Spencer v. Usher

2 Day 116
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided July 1, 1805·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

The Court unanimously affirmed the judgment.

Ells-worth, Asst,

expressed a clear opinion, that the principles, oh which auditors proceed, may be inquired into, to the extent of the rule in Parker v. Avery, which settled the point with precision, and ought to be regarded as a governing [121]*121ease. lie observed, that trials before auditors were partial-larly distinguished in this respect, that there is no court to regulate the admission of evidence, or to instruct the auditors in a point of law ; and that, of consequence, their award could not be assimilated to the verdict of a jury.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spencer v. Usher, 2 Day 116 (Colo. 1805).

2 Day 116 (Spencer v. Usher) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Seymour Trust Co. v. Hershowitz
131 A. 399 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1925)
Day v. Lockwood
24 Conn. 185 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1855)
Lee v. Abrams
12 Ill. 111 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1850)
Webster v. Merriam
9 Conn. 233 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1832)