Spencer v. Traders & General Insurance

173 So. 2d 541, 247 La. 676
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided April 15, 1965·No. No. 47690·Published

Opinion

In re: Bessie Spencer and Leon Rhodes applying for certiorari, or writ of review, to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, Parish of Calcasieu. 171 So.2d 723, 727.

Writ refused. The judgment complained of is correct.

SANDERS, J.,

is of the opinion that a writ should be granted. He is of the opinion that a genuine issue of fact is presented as to whether the automobile was a temporary substitute automobile as defined in the policy. See Fullilove v. United States Casualty Co., 240 La. 859, 125 So.2d 389. The exclusion of automobiles owned by relatives and members of same household does not apply to temporary substitute automobiles. The case should be advanced to trial. •

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spencer v. Traders & General Insurance, 173 So. 2d 541, 247 La. 676 (La. 1965).

173 So. 2d 541 (Spencer v. Traders & General Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Spencer v. Traders & General Insurance Company
171 So. 2d 723 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1965)
Fullilove v. US Casualty Company of New York
125 So. 2d 389 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1960)