Spencer v. Steele

Court of Appeals of Texas

Spencer v. Steele

132 S.W.2d 146

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedOctober 4, 1939

DocketNo. 10708.

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 132 S.W.2d 146 (Spencer v. Steele) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spencer v. Steele, 132 S.W.2d 146 (Tex. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

SMITH, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court refusing a temporary injunction restraining appellees from further performance of a certain contract between the parties appellee, pending trial of the main cause on the merits.

This Court is now efficiently advised that since the perfection of this appeal the main suit has been tried and fully disposed of in the trial court, thereby rendering moot the matter involved in this appeal, to-wit: the refused prayer for temporary injunction pending trial on the merits below.

It appears that the proper order to enter in this Court in such case is one dismissing the cause insofar as appellant prays for a temporary injunction, and it- is so ordered, at the cost of appellant, who was plaintiff below. Service Finance Corp. v. Grote, Tex.Com.App., 131 S.W.2d 93; University Interscholastic League v. Sims, Tex.Com.App., 131 S.W.2d 94.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SMITH, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the District Court refusing a temporary injunction restraining appellees from further performance of a certain contract between the parties appellee, pending trial of the main cause on the merits.

This Court is now efficiently advised that since the perfection of this appeal the main suit has been tried and fully disposed of in the trial court, thereby rendering moot the matter involved in this appeal, to-wit: the refused prayer for temporary injunction pending trial on the merits below.

It appears that the proper order to enter in this Court in such case is one dismissing the cause insofar as appellant prays for a temporary injunction, and it- is so ordered, at the cost of appellant, who was plaintiff below. Service Finance Corp. v. Grote, Tex.Com.App., 131 S.W.2d 93; University Interscholastic League v. Sims, Tex.Com.App., 131 S.W.2d 94.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

132 S.W.2d 146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spencer-v-steele-texapp-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack