Spencer v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Spencer v. State

156 S.W.3d 365, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1862, 2004 WL 2792592

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 7, 2004

DocketED 83959

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 156 S.W.3d 365 (Spencer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spencer v. State, 156 S.W.3d 365, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1862, 2004 WL 2792592 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Frederick Spencer (“Mov-ant”), appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Following a jury trial, Movant was convicted of three counts of forcible sodomy, section 566.060 RSMo (1994), 1 and three counts of rape, section 566.080. Movant was sentenced to five years imprisonment for the first count of forcible sodomy and five years imprisonment for the first count of rape, the sentences to run concurrently, and ten years imprisonment on each of the remaining counts of forcible sodomy and rape, the sentences to run concurrently with each other and consecutively to the five year sentences. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo 1994 unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Frederick Spencer (“Mov-ant”), appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Following a jury trial, Movant was convicted of three counts of forcible sodomy, section 566.060 RSMo (1994), 1 and three counts of rape, section 566.080. Movant was sentenced to five years imprisonment for the first count of forcible sodomy and five years imprisonment for the first count of rape, the sentences to run concurrently, and ten years imprisonment on each of the remaining counts of forcible sodomy and rape, the sentences to run concurrently with each other and consecutively to the five year sentences. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo 1994 unless otherwise indicated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

156 S.W.3d 365, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1862, 2004 WL 2792592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spencer-v-state-moctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack