Spencer v. State

156 S.W.3d 365, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1862, 2004 WL 2792592
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 7, 2004·No. ED 83959·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Frederick Spencer (“Mov-ant”), appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Following a jury trial, Movant was convicted of three counts of forcible sodomy, section 566.060 RSMo (1994), 1 and three counts of rape, section 566.080. Movant was sentenced to five years imprisonment for the first count of forcible sodomy and five years imprisonment for the first count of rape, the sentences to run concurrently, and ten years imprisonment on each of the remaining counts of forcible sodomy and rape, the sentences to run concurrently with each other and consecutively to the five year sentences. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo 1994 unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spencer v. State, 156 S.W.3d 365, 2004 Mo. App. LEXIS 1862, 2004 WL 2792592 (Mo. Ct. App. 2004).

156 S.W.3d 365 (Spencer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Spencer
569 S.W.3d 477 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2018)
Frederick Spencer v. George Lombardi
500 S.W.3d 885 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2016)
Spencer v. State
255 S.W.3d 527 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)