Spencer v. State
892 S.W.2d 402, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 283, 1995 WL 66980
Opinion
ORDER
Defendant appeals from the dismissal of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentia-ry hearing because it was untimely filed under Rule 24.035(b).
Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Spencer v. State, 892 S.W.2d 402, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 283, 1995 WL 66980 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).
892 S.W.2d 402 (Spencer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Shameka Rushing v. AMISUB (SFH), Inc.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee, 2017