Spencer v. State
This text of 95 So. 3d 1056 (Spencer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re Spencer, Edmond D.; — Plaintiff; Applying For Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Washington, 22nd Judicial District Court Div. E, Nos. 0640746, 064076; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Nos. 2011 KW 1806, 2012 KW 0717.
Relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on a motion for production of transcripts of post-conviction proceedings and a motion for constructive contempt, pursuant to La.C.Cr.P. art. 23 filed on or about September 2, 2010. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the motion(s). If relator’s representation is incorrect, the district court is ordered to accept, file and act upon the pleading which is herewith transferred to the district court. The district court is ordered to provide this Court with a copy of its judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
95 So. 3d 1056, 2012 WL 3705096, 2012 La. LEXIS 2261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spencer-v-state-la-2012.