Spencer v. State
794 So. 2d 616, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1769, 2001 WL 166705
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 21, 2001·No. No. 2D00-4432·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Edward Spencer appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the trial court’s order denying Spencer relief without prejudice to any right Spencer might have to file, pursuant to rule 3.850, a timely, facially sufficient motion for postconviction relief should there be sufficient grounds for him to do so. See Murphy v. State, 773 So.2d 1174 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000) (en banc).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Spencer v. State, 794 So. 2d 616, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1769, 2001 WL 166705 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
794 So. 2d 616 (Spencer v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Collier v. Parker
794 So. 2d 616 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)