Spencer v. Stanley

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Spencer v. Stanley

76 N.W. 953, 74 Minn. 35, 1898 Minn. LEXIS 857

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedOctober 25, 1898

DocketNos. 11,239—(40)

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 76 N.W. 953 (Spencer v. Stanley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spencer v. Stanley, 76 N.W. 953, 74 Minn. 35, 1898 Minn. LEXIS 857 (Mich. 1898).

Pincite

Opinion

CANTY, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying a new trial. The paper book contains a notice of motion for a new trial, which does not state any grounds for the motion. This is fatal. See Clark v. Nelson Lumber Co., 34 Minn. 289, 25 N. W. 628.

But we will go further. The return does not show any notice of motion at all, and this is equally fatal.

[36]*36The order appealed from should therefore be affirmed. So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CANTY, J.

This is an appeal from an order denying a new trial. The paper book contains a notice of motion for a new trial, which does not state any grounds for the motion. This is fatal. See Clark v. Nelson Lumber Co., 34 Minn. 289, 25 N. W. 628.

But we will go further. The return does not show any notice of motion at all, and this is equally fatal.

[36]*36The order appealed from should therefore be affirmed. So ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

76 N.W. 953, 74 Minn. 35, 1898 Minn. LEXIS 857, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spencer-v-stanley-minn-1898.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack