Spencer v. Spencer

229 N.W.2d 18, 304 Minn. 549, 1975 Minn. LEXIS 1461
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedApril 25, 1975
DocketNo. 44854
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 229 N.W.2d 18 (Spencer v. Spencer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spencer v. Spencer, 229 N.W.2d 18, 304 Minn. 549, 1975 Minn. LEXIS 1461 (Mich. 1975).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this appeal by plaintiff in a divorce action, he challenges the trial court’s division of property. Defendant seeks review of the amount awarded for the support of a minor daughter. Upon our comprehensive review of the record and a careful consideration of the briefs and oral argument, we are not persuaded that the trial court abused its discretionary authority.

The property division made was well within the alternatives available under the evidence and was based upon findings amply supported by the evidence which in no respect could be held clearly erroneous under Rule 52.01, Rules of Civil Procedure, which authorizes the broadest possible scope of review. In re Estate of Balafas, 293 Minn. 94, 198 N. W. 2d 260 (1972). We view the amount awarded for child support similarly. We therefore affirm without extended opinion since no precedential purpose would thereby be served.

Affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice Sheran took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marriage of Mentzos v. Mentzos
353 N.W.2d 683 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
229 N.W.2d 18, 304 Minn. 549, 1975 Minn. LEXIS 1461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spencer-v-spencer-minn-1975.