Spencer v. Spencer
This text of 177 A.3d 565 (Spencer v. Spencer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff's petition for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court,
"1. Did the trial court properly rectify and articulate its original judgment, more than twelve months after its issuance, within the scope of the Appellate Court's grant of the defendant's motion for rectification and articulation?
"2. If the answer to the first question is no, did the Appellate Court properly affirm the judgment of the trial court terminating the plaintiffs alimony only on the basis of factual findings or conclusions of law that were part of the original judgment of the trial court?
"3. Did the Appellate Court properly affirm the trial court's finding of cohabitation on the basis of a definition of 'cohabitation' that does not require a romantic or sexual relationship between the alimony recipient and the individual with whom they reside?"
MULLINS, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
177 A.3d 565, 328 Conn. 903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spencer-v-spencer-conn-2018.