Spencer v. NYC Taxi & Limousine Commission

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Spencer v. NYC Taxi & Limousine Commission

30 A.D.3d 300, 816 N.Y.S.2d 682

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 22, 2006·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Marylin G. Diamond, J.), entered on or about June 8, 2005, which denied the petitioner’s application to annul respondent’s determination denying petitioner’s application for a license to operate a taxi in New York City, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner’s previous operation of a for-hire vehicle without a license and many recent traffic violations provide a rational basis for denying him a taxi license (see Matter of Howell v Benson, 90 AD2d 903 [1982], lv denied 58 NY2d 611 [1983]). Concur—Tom, J.P, Friedman, Sullivan, Catterson and Malone, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Marylin G. Diamond, J.), entered on or about June 8, 2005, which denied the petitioner’s application to annul respondent’s determination denying petitioner’s application for a license to operate a taxi in New York City, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner’s previous operation of a for-hire vehicle without a license and many recent traffic violations provide a rational basis for denying him a taxi license (see Matter of Howell v Benson, 90 AD2d 903 [1982], lv denied 58 NY2d 611 [1983]). Concur—Tom, J.P, Friedman, Sullivan, Catterson and Malone, JJ.

Spencer v. NYC Taxi & Limousine Commission, 30 A.D.3d 300, 816 N.Y.S.2d 682 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

30 A.D.3d 300 (Spencer v. NYC Taxi & Limousine Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related