Spencer v. Northwestern National Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Spencer v. Northwestern National Insurance

109 S.E. 510, 27 Ga. App. 710, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 376

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedNovember 18, 1921

Docket12648

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 109 S.E. 510 (Spencer v. Northwestern National Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spencer v. Northwestern National Insurance, 109 S.E. 510, 27 Ga. App. 710, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 376 (Ga. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, J.

1. In a suit on an open account the original petition alleged that the defendant was indebted to the petitioner “ in the principal sum of two thousand one hundred seven & 94/100 dollars for the net balance of insurance premiums on policies of insurance written by the defendant in behalf of petitioner as local agent in said county;” and an exhibit was attached to and made a part of the petition, showing the various amounts, the months when due, and the interest on each amount, which together made the total sum sued for. To meet a demurrer, an amendment was made, giving a minutely itemized statement of the account, and the demurrer was overruled. Held: No error. Southern Ry. Co. v. Grant, 136 Ga. 303 (71 S. E. 422, Ann. 1912C, 472).

2. In all cases involving matters of account the judge may, upon the application of either party, or upon his own motion, where in his judgment the facts and circumstances of the case require it, appoint an auditor to investigate such matters of account. Civil Code (1910), § 5128. This statutory discretion will not be interfered with, unless abused. Martin v. Foley, 82 Ga. 552 (9 S. E. 532) ; Mayor &c. of Gainesville v. Jaudon, 145 Ga. 303 (89 S. E. 210).

3. An action on open account, with bill of particulars attached, consisting of several hundred items of alleged indebtedness, where the defendant denies each paragraph of the petition, making it necessary to examine the books of both plaintiff and defendant, thus constituting complex and intricate matters of account which cannot be conveniently and safely examined in a court by a jury, may be properly referred to an auditor. The present record shows clearly such a case.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hill, J.

1. In a suit on an open account the original petition alleged that the defendant was indebted to the petitioner “ in the principal sum of two thousand one hundred seven & 94/100 dollars for the net balance of insurance premiums on policies of insurance written by the defendant in behalf of petitioner as local agent in said county;” and an exhibit was attached to and made a part of the petition, showing the various amounts, the months when due, and the interest on each amount, which together made the total sum sued for. To meet a demurrer, an amendment was made, giving a minutely itemized statement of the account, and the demurrer was overruled. Held: No error. Southern Ry. Co. v. Grant, 136 Ga. 303 (71 S. E. 422, Ann. 1912C, 472).

2. In all cases involving matters of account the judge may, upon the application of either party, or upon his own motion, where in his judgment the facts and circumstances of the case require it, appoint an auditor to investigate such matters of account. Civil Code (1910), § 5128. This statutory discretion will not be interfered with, unless abused. Martin v. Foley, 82 Ga. 552 (9 S. E. 532) ; Mayor &c. of Gainesville v. Jaudon, 145 Ga. 303 (89 S. E. 210).

3. An action on open account, with bill of particulars attached, consisting of several hundred items of alleged indebtedness, where the defendant denies each paragraph of the petition, making it necessary to examine the books of both plaintiff and defendant, thus constituting complex and intricate matters of account which cannot be conveniently and safely examined in a court by a jury, may be properly referred to an auditor. The present record shows clearly such a case.

Judgment affirmed.

Jenkins, P. J., and Stephens, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 S.E. 510, 27 Ga. App. 710, 1921 Ga. App. LEXIS 376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spencer-v-northwestern-national-insurance-gactapp-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack