Spencer v. Newrez, LLC

S.D. Mississippi

Spencer v. Newrez, LLC

DecidedMay 13, 2025

Docket1:23-cv-00223

StatusUnknown

This text of Spencer v. Newrez, LLC (Spencer v. Newrez, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Mississippi primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spencer v. Newrez, LLC, (S.D. Miss. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION TIFFANY T. SPENCER PLAINTIFF v. CAUSE NO. 1:23-cv-223-LG-RPM NEWREZ, LLC d/b/a SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING; BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, Indenture Trustee, for WIMC Capital Trust 2011-1; JOHN DOES 1–10 DEFENDANTS

ORDER GRANTING [32] MOTION TO DISMISS Defendant Newrez LLC, doing business as Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing (“Shellpoint”) seeks dismissal of the [30] Amended Complaint. The Court grants this motion for the reasons stated on the record at the hearing held in this matter on May 13, 2025. The Court also finds the Amended Complaint amounts to a shotgun pleading, which violates Federal Rule of Procedure 8(a)(2). See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555–58, 570 (2007)); Strategic Income Fund, L.L.C. v. Spear, Leeds & Kellogg Corp., 305 F.3d 1293, 1295 (11th Cir. 2002) (“The typical shotgun complaint contains several counts, each one incorporating by reference the allegations of its predecessors, leading to a situation where most of the counts (i.e., all but the first) contain irrelevant factual allegations and legal conclusions.”). IT IS THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Shellpoint’s [32] Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Tiffany T. Spencer’s [30] Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The plaintiff is granted leave to file a second amended complaint within thirty days of this Order.

SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 13th day of May, 2025. Louis Guirola, Jr. s/ LOUIS GUIROLA, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI SOUTHERN DIVISION TIFFANY T. SPENCER PLAINTIFF v. CAUSE NO. 1:23-cv-223-LG-RPM NEWREZ, LLC d/b/a SHELLPOINT MORTGAGE SERVICING; BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, Indenture Trustee, for WIMC Capital Trust 2011-1; JOHN DOES 1–10 DEFENDANTS

ORDER GRANTING [32] MOTION TO DISMISS Defendant Newrez LLC, doing business as Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing (“Shellpoint”) seeks dismissal of the [30] Amended Complaint. The Court grants this motion for the reasons stated on the record at the hearing held in this matter on May 13, 2025. The Court also finds the Amended Complaint amounts to a shotgun pleading, which violates Federal Rule of Procedure 8(a)(2). See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555–58, 570 (2007)); Strategic Income Fund, L.L.C. v. Spear, Leeds & Kellogg Corp., 305 F.3d 1293, 1295 (11th Cir. 2002) (“The typical shotgun complaint contains several counts, each one incorporating by reference the allegations of its predecessors, leading to a situation where most of the counts (i.e., all but the first) contain irrelevant factual allegations and legal conclusions.”). IT IS THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Shellpoint’s [32] Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Tiffany T. Spencer’s [30] Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The plaintiff is granted leave to file a second amended complaint within thirty days of this Order.

SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED this the 13th day of May, 2025. Louis Guirola, Jr. s/ LOUIS GUIROLA, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Spencer v. Newrez, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spencer-v-newrez-llc-mssd-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack