Spencer v. Nevada State Welfare Division
Opinion
OPINION
The natural father of five minor children born out of wedlock appeals an order terminating his parental rights. He here contends the district court erred in finding him an unfit parent, [628]*628and in finding he had made only “token efforts” to avoid being declared unfit.1
In our view, the record supports the judgment. There is ample evidence of an unstable and chaotic homelife, ultimately resulting in the children being taken into State Welfare custody for neglect and abandonment; of failure to make support payments as ordered; of failure to provide for medical needs, despite repeated notification by telephone and mail; and of erratic attendance of court-ordered counseling sessions to improve appellant’s domestic situation. It appears that appellant has, in fact, never provided the children with an adequate homelife for any substantial period of time, and, in determining appropriatate action for their best interest, the district court judge noted all five were still under the age of eight.
We are unable to say that the lower court erred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
584 P.2d 669 (Spencer v. Nevada State Welfare Division) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.