Spencer v. Moore

Eighth Circuit

Spencer v. Moore

41 F. App'x 11

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided July 9, 2002·No. No. 02-2153·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Missouri inmate Randy G. Spencer appeals from the district court’s¹ dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) and (2). Upon careful de novo review of the record, see Portley-El v. Brill, 288 F.3d 1063, 1065 (8th Cir.2002), we conclude that Spencer’s complaint was properly dismissed because it failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Missouri inmate Randy G. Spencer appeals from the district court’s¹ dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) and (2). Upon careful de novo review of the record, see Portley-El v. Brill, 288 F.3d 1063, 1065 (8th Cir.2002), we conclude that Spencer’s complaint was properly dismissed because it failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Footnotes

Spencer v. Moore, 41 F. App'x 11 (8th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

41 F. App'x 11 (Spencer v. Moore) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Footnotes

Related