Spencer v. Moore

Eighth Circuit

Spencer v. Moore

41 F. App'x 11

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedJuly 9, 2002

DocketNo. 02-2153

StatusPublished

This text of 41 F. App'x 11 (Spencer v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Spencer v. Moore, 41 F. App'x 11 (8th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Missouri inmate Randy G. Spencer appeals from the district court’s¹ dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) and (2). Upon careful de novo review of the record, see Portley-El v. Brill, 288 F.3d 1063, 1065 (8th Cir.2002), we conclude that Spencer’s complaint was properly dismissed because it failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Missouri inmate Randy G. Spencer appeals from the district court’s¹ dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) and (2). Upon careful de novo review of the record, see Portley-El v. Brill, 288 F.3d 1063, 1065 (8th Cir.2002), we conclude that Spencer’s complaint was properly dismissed because it failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 F. App'x 11, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spencer-v-moore-ca8-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack