Spencer v. Lawson, 1991598 (Ala. 9-14-2001)

815 So. 2d 502, 2001 Ala. LEXIS 352
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided September 14, 2001·No. 1991598·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

On Return From Remand

On March 2, 2001, we remanded this case in accord with Love v.Johnson, 775 So.2d 127 (Ala. 2000), for the trial court to enter an order stating its reasons for allowing the motion for a remittitur to be denied by operation of law. On remand, the trial court held a hearing on the excessiveness of the punitive-damages award. It then entered an order remitting the punitive damages from $250,000 to $60,000 and explaining the trial court's reasoning for that remittitur. After reviewing the order, the record, and the briefs in this case, we see no error in the trial court's ruling. The trial court's order is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

Houston, See, Brown, Johnstone, Harwood, Woodall, and Stuart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spencer v. Lawson, 1991598 (Ala. 9-14-2001), 815 So. 2d 502, 2001 Ala. LEXIS 352 (Ala. 2001).

815 So. 2d 502 (Spencer v. Lawson, 1991598 (Ala. 9-14-2001)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. Heard
256 So. 3d 644 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2017)
Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Morris
228 So. 3d 971 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2016)
Target Media Partners Operating Co. v. Specialty Marketing Corp.
177 So. 3d 843 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2013)
Williford v. Emerton, 1020616 (Ala. 3-26-2004)
935 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2004)
SOUTHERN PINE ELEC. CO-OP. v. Burch
878 So. 2d 1120 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2003)