Spencer v. Huntington

6 Conn. 312
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJuly 15, 1826
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 6 Conn. 312 (Spencer v. Huntington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spencer v. Huntington, 6 Conn. 312 (Colo. 1826).

Opinion

[315]*315By the Court,

(Peters, J.

being absent.) The declaration was adjudged insufficient. The reporter, not having been furnished with the reasons of their judgment, by the Judge designated to give them, is unable to state them fully. From the observations made, by the several Judges, during the consultation, he understood all who were present, to express an opinion, that the present plaintiff, as treasurer of the state, could not sustain an action of debt for the penalty in question. Though there were some remarks made upon other points in, the case, he cannot say, with any degree of confidence, that, a majority of the Judges concurred in opinion on any other point.

Judgment for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bissell v. Spencer
9 Conn. 275 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1832)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Conn. 312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spencer-v-huntington-conn-1826.