Spencer v. Garvin

Fourth Circuit

Spencer v. Garvin

585 F. App'x 851

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 24, 2014·No. No. 14-1666·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Janies Spencer appeals the district court’s orders denying Spencer’s latest motions for recusal of the district court judge and for a “declaratory judgment” vacating the judgment on the settlement agreement in this case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Spencer v. Garvin, No. 4:02-cv-01859-RBH (D.S.C. June 11 & 18, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Janies Spencer appeals the district court’s orders denying Spencer’s latest motions for recusal of the district court judge and for a “declaratory judgment” vacating the judgment on the settlement agreement in this case. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Spencer v. Garvin, No. 4:02-cv-01859-RBH (D.S.C. June 11 & 18, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Spencer v. Garvin, 585 F. App'x 851 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

585 F. App'x 851 (Spencer v. Garvin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.