Spencer v. Florida Power Light/Broadspire

141 So. 3d 203, 2013 WL 5848468, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17320
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 31, 2013·No. No. 1D13-1703·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On September 11, 2013, after receiving and reviewing Appellant’s initial brief, this court entered an order advising the parties [204]*204that this appeal is being considered for summary affirmance under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.315(a). Accordingly, the parties were directed to refrain from further briefing. Appellant filed a response to this court’s preliminary summary affirmance order, arguing (in essence) that this case is not appropriate for summary affirmance because Appellant filed her brief in good faith and her arguments are meritorious. Under rule 9.315(a), summary affirmance is appropriate where the initial brief fails to present a “preliminary basis for reversal,” regardless of the good-faith intentions of the filing party. Because we conclude that Appellant’s initial brief fails to demonstrate a preliminary legal or factual basis for the reversal of the appealed orders, we affirm the appealed orders under rule 9.315(a), and deny on the merits Appellant’s motion requesting another means of disposition.

AFFIRMED.

VAN NORTWICK, ROWE, and MARSTILLER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spencer v. Florida Power Light/Broadspire, 141 So. 3d 203, 2013 WL 5848468, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 17320 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

141 So. 3d 203 (Spencer v. Florida Power Light/Broadspire) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cabrera v. Outdoor Empire Inc.
134 So. 3d 573 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)