Spencer v. Earley

Fourth Circuit

Spencer v. Earley

88 F. App'x 599

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 23, 2004·No. No. 03-7037·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Michael Lee Spencer, Sr., appeals the district court’s orders granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss and denying Spencer’s motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Spencer v. Earley, No. CA-01-1578-AM (E.D. Va. filed May 30, 2003 & entered June 2, 2003, filed July 15, 2003 & entered July 17, 2003). We deny Spencer’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Michael Lee Spencer, Sr., appeals the district court’s orders granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss and denying Spencer’s motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Spencer v. Earley, No. CA-01-1578-AM (E.D. Va. filed May 30, 2003 & entered June 2, 2003, filed July 15, 2003 & entered July 17, 2003). We deny Spencer’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Spencer v. Earley, 88 F. App'x 599 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

88 F. App'x 599 (Spencer v. Earley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related