Spence v. United States

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7394

DANIEL L. SPENCE, a/k/a Daniel Johnson,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

No. 04-7526

DANIEL L. SPENCE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

THOMAS DIBIAGIO, United States Attorney; JOHN J. BARRY, Federal Bureau of Investigations; PETER GIANIODIS, Bank of America (Nations Bank); JAMES ULWICK, Kramon and Graham, P.A.; GLEN CASE, Howard County Police Department; SHARON DENISE JORDAN; STACY GIANIODIS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (CA-04-2065-WDQ; CA-04-2031-1-WDQ) Submitted: November 3, 2004 Decided: November 18, 2004

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel L. Spence, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Daniel L. Spence seeks to

appeal the district court’s denial of relief on his two 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 (2000) complaints. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Spence v. United States, No. CA-04-2065-WDQ

(D. Md. July 29, 2004); Spence v. DiBiagio, No. CA-04-2031-1-WDQ

(D. Md. July 29, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -