Spence v. State

882 So. 2d 427, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 12132, 2004 WL 1837939
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 18, 2004
DocketNo. 4D04-495
StatusPublished

This text of 882 So. 2d 427 (Spence v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spence v. State, 882 So. 2d 427, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 12132, 2004 WL 1837939 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. This court’s affirmance is without prejudice to appellant raising the sentencing issue in the trial court by petition for post-conviction relief. See Drayton v. State, 791 So.2d 522, 523 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001); Garrett v. State, 788 So.2d 328 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). See also Boler v. State, 678 So.2d 319 (Fla.1996); Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521, 524 (Fla.1993).

STONE, WARNER and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hale v. State
630 So. 2d 521 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1993)
Drayton v. State
791 So. 2d 522 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Garrett v. State
788 So. 2d 328 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Boler v. State
678 So. 2d 319 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
882 So. 2d 427, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 12132, 2004 WL 1837939, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spence-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.