Spence v. Spence
174 A.2d 734, 1961 D.C. App. LEXIS 327
Opinion
This appeal is from an order denying a motion to vacate an order requiring appellant to make monthly payments to his wife [735] for her separate maintenance. The sole error claimed is that the court’s action constituted an abuse of discretion. The record furnishes no support for this claim of error.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Spence v. Spence, 174 A.2d 734, 1961 D.C. App. LEXIS 327 (D.C. 1961).
174 A.2d 734 (Spence v. Spence) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.