Spence v. Phoenix Assur. Co.
This text of 89 S.E. 319 (Spence v. Phoenix Assur. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
This is an action upon a standard policy of fire insurance; and the question presented by the exceptions, is whether the defendant’s failure after the fire to return the premium of insurance, or the unearned portion thereof, in accordance with the provisions of the policy, was evidence of waiver.
His Honor, the presiding Judge, ruled that such failure did not tend to show waiver, and accordingly directed a verdict in favor of the defendant. The respondent’s attorneys were granted permission to review 'the case of Scott v. Insurance Co., 102 S. C. 115, 86 S. E. 484.
*405 The Court adheres to the decision in. that case, which is conclusive of this appeal.
Tudgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
89 S.E. 319, 104 S.C. 403, 1916 S.C. LEXIS 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spence-v-phoenix-assur-co-sc-1916.