Spence v. Department of Highways

16 Ct. Cl. 71
West Virginia Court of Claims·Decided February 19, 1986·No. CC-85-224·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

On May 26, 1985, claimant Frank Spence was operating his 1981 Plymouth Horizon on U.S. 52 in a southerly direction toward Crum, when he hit a pothole. Claimant, Frank Spence, originally filed the claim in his own name; however the record reflects that his wife, Margaret Spence, is also a titled owner of the vehicle. The Court, on its own Motion, amended the style of the claim to include Margaret Spence as a party claimant. The vehicle was damaged in the amount of $552.40. After claimant Frank Spence introduced evidence of damages in the aforementioned amount, the Court amended the amount of the original claim to reflect that amount. Claimant Frank Spence testified that he did not see the pothole until he hit it. Although he travelled that route frequently, he had not observed the pothole prior to this accident. Claimant Frank Spence knew of no complaints to respondent about the pothole prior to this incident.

The State is neither an insurer nor a guarantor of the safety of persons travelling on its highways. Adkins vs. Sims, 130 W.Va. 645 (1947). For the State to be found liable, it must first have had either actual or constructive notice of the defect in the roadway. Since there was no proof in this case that the State had such notice of the defect, the claim must be denied.

Claim disallowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spence v. Department of Highways, 16 Ct. Cl. 71 (W. Va. Super. Ct. 1986).

16 Ct. Cl. 71 (Spence v. Department of Highways) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Adkins v. Sims
46 S.E.2d 81 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1947)