Spence v. Beck

1 Hilt. 276
CourtNew York Court of Common Pleas
DecidedJanuary 15, 1857
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 1 Hilt. 276 (Spence v. Beck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spence v. Beck, 1 Hilt. 276 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1857).

Opinion

Inge uiam, First Judge. —

None of tbe grounds, stated in tbe notice of appeal, appear in tbe return, but arc contradicted by it. We can never suffer a return to be impeached by affidavit. If tbe return is erroneous, it must be corrected by motion [277]*277to the court. On the appeal we are governed by the statements contained therein.

The justice states that he orally communicated to the party the complaint, and offered to permit him to cross-examine the witness, but that the defendant refused and left the court.

If the facts sworn to by the appellant had been returned by the justice as occurring on the trial, the judgment could not be sustained, but we are concluded by the return.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marsh v. Peckham
245 A.D. 14 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1935)
Young v. Conklin
23 N.Y.S. 993 (New York County Courts, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Hilt. 276, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spence-v-beck-nyctcompl-1857.