Spelmon v. New York City Interborough Railway Co.

242 A.D. 699

This text of 242 A.D. 699 (Spelmon v. New York City Interborough Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Spelmon v. New York City Interborough Railway Co., 242 A.D. 699 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Lazansky, P. J., Young and Hagarty, JJ., concur; Scudder and Davis, JJ., concur for affirmance in respect to plaintiff’s right to recover damages and vote to reinstate the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
242 A.D. 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spelmon-v-new-york-city-interborough-railway-co-nyappdiv-1934.