Spelman v. Westinghouse, Church, Kerr & Co.
This text of 192 A.D. 918 (Spelman v. Westinghouse, Church, Kerr & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The rule respecting a change of venue from a rural county to the county of New York is not inflexible. (Broderick v. De Mesa, 178 App. Div. 669.) We are of the opinion that this case is one where the venue should be changed for the convenience of witnesses most of whom, it appears, are residents of the county of New York. The order is, therefore, [919]*919reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion to change the venue from Dutchess county to New York county is granted, with ten dollars costs. Jenks, P. J., Mills, Rich, Putnam and Kelly, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
192 A.D. 918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spelman-v-westinghouse-church-kerr-co-nyappdiv-1920.