Spelman v. State
This text of 1924 OK CR 11 (Spelman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
W. H. Spelman, plaintiff in error, was by information filed in the county court of Payne county September 29, 1921, charged with the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquors at his place of business in Stillwater. At the trial, December 1, 1921, he was found guilty as charged, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $50 and confinement in the county jail for a period of 30 days. From the judgment on this verdict he appeals.
The plaintiff in error in his brief and argument urges but one assignment of error, namely, that the proof is insufficient to support the verdict. ¥e have examined the testimony, and conclude that this assignment is not borne out by the record. The testimony is conflicting, but there is evidence, if believed by the jury, sufficient to support the verdict. The jury, under such circumstances, are the judges of the weight of the testimony and the credibility of the witnesses.
The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1924 OK CR 11, 221 P. 1044, 26 Okla. Crim. 47, 1924 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 11, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spelman-v-state-oklacrimapp-1924.