Spellum v. La Crosse & Southeastern Railway Co.
134 N.W. 369, 148 Wis. 290, 1912 Wisc. LEXIS 62
This text of 134 N.W. 369 (Spellum v. La Crosse & Southeastern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Spellum v. La Crosse & Southeastern Railway Co., 134 N.W. 369, 148 Wis. 290, 1912 Wisc. LEXIS 62 (Wis. 1912).
Opinion
The same points are raised in this case as in Hauge v. La Crosse & Southeastern R. Co., ante, p. 288. The circumstances in the two cases being alike, the judgment must be affirmed for th& reasoning stated for affirming that in the other case.
By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
134 N.W. 369, 148 Wis. 290, 1912 Wisc. LEXIS 62, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/spellum-v-la-crosse-southeastern-railway-co-wis-1912.