Spells v. Foley

434 N.E.2d 259, 55 N.Y.2d 922, 449 N.Y.S.2d 190, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3113
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 9, 1982·Published

Opinion

Appeal dismissed, without costs, by the Court of Appeals sua sponte, upon the ground that the stipulation for judgment absolute, under the facts of this case, is illusory and frustrates the very purpose of CPLR 5601 (subd [c]) (Goldberg v Elkom Co., 36 NY2d 914).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spells v. Foley, 434 N.E.2d 259, 55 N.Y.2d 922, 449 N.Y.S.2d 190, 1982 N.Y. LEXIS 3113 (N.Y. 1982).

434 N.E.2d 259 (Spells v. Foley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Goldberg v. Elkom Co.
334 N.E.2d 600 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)