Spellmon v. Morales
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
_____________________
No. 95-50514
Summary Calendar _____________________
TERRENCE R. SPELLMON,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DAN MORALES, Attorney General, ET AL.,
Defendants-Appellees.
_________________________________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (A-94-CV-464) _________________________________________________________________ April 9, 1996 Before KING, GARWOOD, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Terrence Spellmon appeals from the dismissal of his suit,
without prejudice, for failure to exhaust state-court remedies.
Because Spellmon fails to state a constitutional violation, he
has not stated a claim for relief under either 28 U.S.C. § 2254
or 42 U.S.C. § 1983. see Orellana v. Kyle, 65 F.3d 29, 31 (5th
Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 736 (1996). The district
court's judgment is AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Spellmon v. Morales (Spellmon v. Morales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.