Spellmon v. Morales

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 23, 1996·No. 95-50514·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_____________________

No. 95-50514

Summary Calendar _____________________

TERRENCE R. SPELLMON,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

DAN MORALES, Attorney General, ET AL.,

Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas (A-94-CV-464) _________________________________________________________________ April 9, 1996 Before KING, GARWOOD, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Terrence Spellmon appeals from the dismissal of his suit,

without prejudice, for failure to exhaust state-court remedies.

Because Spellmon fails to state a constitutional violation, he

has not stated a claim for relief under either 28 U.S.C. § 2254

or 42 U.S.C. § 1983. see Orellana v. Kyle, 65 F.3d 29, 31 (5th

Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 736 (1996). The district

court's judgment is AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spellmon v. Morales, (5th Cir. 1996).

Spellmon v. Morales (Spellmon v. Morales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Orellana v. Kyle
65 F.3d 29 (Fifth Circuit, 1995)