Speller v. State
545 So. 2d 968, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1637, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3839, 1989 WL 73756
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 7, 1989·No. No. 87-02917·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s convictions for burglary of a structure, grand theft, and possession of burglary tools. However, because the concurrent five-and-one-half-year sentences exceed the statutory maximum for each of the offenses, appellant must be resentenced.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded with instructions.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Speller v. State, 545 So. 2d 968, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1637, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 3839, 1989 WL 73756 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
545 So. 2d 968 (Speller v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mitchell v. State
573 So. 2d 446 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)